Showing posts with label Thesis Papers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Thesis Papers. Show all posts

Sunday, July 31, 2016

Major General James Scott Negley, by Major Keith A. Barclay (thesis, link)

 Major General James Scott Negley and His Division at Chickamauga: A Historical Analysis
(PDF, 136 pages)

Major Keith A. Barclay
U.S. Army Command and General Staff College
B.A., Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, Pennsylvania, 1989


[THESIS: 136-PAGE PDF DOWNLOADS AUTOMATICALLY WHEN YOU CLICK ON LINK. ]
http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA395223


Thesis Subjects: General James Scott Negley, The Chickamauga Campaign

Role of Union Cavalry in the Atlanta Campaign, The: Robert Blake Leach (link)

The Role of Union Cavalry in the Atlanta Campaign
Major Robert Blake Leach 
Master's Thesis, University of Kentucky, 1980; pub. Ft. Leavenworth, 1994.
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a284554.pdf

I go back to this thesis quite often and have used it as a source. It is a helpful summary and is easy to read (clear, well written). Among other things, it makes a significant point about technological advances during the Civil War, which began to impact the traditional role of cavalry.

Role of Union Cavalry in the Chickamauga Campaign, The: John J. Londa (link)

The Role of Union Cavalry in the Chickamauga Campaign
Major John J. Londa
Master's thesis,  United States Military Academy, 1978; pub. Ft. Leavenworth, 1991.

PDF - 149 PAGES. AUTOMATIC DOWNLOAD WHEN YOU CLICK ON LINK!
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a241432.pdf

This source contains a further breakdown of Stanley's Cavalry Corps, into two divisions of three brigades each, with several officers pertinent to my own Civil War project; namely, A.P. Campbell, E.M. McCook, and Eli Long. Two other officers, Watkins and Lowe, are less often mentioned in my particular sources). See pages 22 and 24 for organization charts.

So far, I've only skimmed this one, but I usually find these thesis papers helpful. I'm no expert, so I can't vouch for the quality of the research or anything. Take it on its own merit.